Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Mr Femi Falana, says there is no such thing as a want for the Infectious Ailments Invoice
The proposed Infectious Ailments Invoice co-sponsored by the Speaker of the Home of Representatives, Femi Gbajabiamila, and two of his colleagues has been described as superfluous, unlawful and unconstitutional.
Human rights lawyer and Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Mr Femi Falana, informed Channels Tv on Wednesday that the efforts to exchange the Quarantine Act was a waste of time because the Nigeria Centre for Illness Management and Prevention Act of 2018 has taken care of what the lawmakers try to attain.
Mr Falana, who spoke in regards to the controversial invoice throughout an look, through Skype, on Politics Immediately, stated, “It’s pertinent to tell Nigerians that in November 2018, a regulation was enacted on this nation – the Nigeria Centre for Illness Management Act, NCDC Act, which has taken care of infectious ailments within the nation.
“So, it isn’t appropriate, in actual fact, it’s deceptive on the a part of the Home of Representatives to say that it’s amending the 1926 Quarantine Act as a result of there may be already a growth between 1926 and now. You had the 2018 Act which has taken care of all the provisions of the brand new invoice.
“The brand new invoice, so far as the regulation is anxious, is superfluous. Its provisions are largely unlawful and unconstitutional.”
An in depth take a look at some sections of the stated Act reveals that the laws empowers the NCDC to forestall, detect, monitor and management of nationwide and worldwide public well being significance.
The regulation additionally empowers the NCDC to develop and coordinate capabilities, measures and actions to regulate outbreaks and mitigate the well being influence of public well being disasters.
As Nigeria battles the raging COVID-19 pandemic, a number of measures have been applied to halt the unfold of the virus which has contaminated 2,950 folks within the nation and claimed 98 lives.
The introduction of the infectious illness invoice has, nevertheless, proved controversial with many calling for it to be dumped.
READ ALSO: Infectious Ailments Invoice Conceived In Public Curiosity – Gbajabiamila
On Tuesday, in response to the controversy surrounding the invoice, Mr Gbajabiamila defended it, saying it was conceived in public curiosity.
Gbajabiamila whereas addressing his colleagues on the resumption of plenary famous that because the introduction of the Invoice every week in the past, it drew a barrage of criticisms in opposition to it, with allegations of sinister motives.
“None of these allegations are true. Unfortunately, we now live in a time when conspiracy theories have gained such currency that genuine endeavours in the public interest can quickly become mischaracterised and misconstrued to raise the spectre of sinister intent and ominous possibility,” he stated.
“This Home of Representatives won’t ever take any motion that functions to deliver hurt to any Nigerian right here at residence or overseas. As we’ve to date proven by our conduct, the resolutions and actions we take on this ninth Home of Representatives will at all times be in the most effective pursuits of the Nigerian individuals who elected us, and nobody else.
“Within the latest uproar, sure elementary truths have been misplaced and are value remembering. Our present framework for the prevention and administration of infectious ailments is out of date and not match for goal.
“The present regulation severely constrains the flexibility of the Federal Authorities of Nigeria and the Nigeria Centre for Illness Management (NCDC) to take proactive motion to forestall the entry into Nigeria of infectious ailments and the administration of public well being emergencies once they happen,” he stated.